Shinji Hazawa vs Antoine Berger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Aug at 03:48 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Hazawa vs A. Berger

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hazawa 1 - 0 Berger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Shinji Hazawa winning 2 and Antoine Berger winning 0. The last match between Shinji Hazawa and Antoine Berger was at the M15 Hong Kong, 27-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Shinji Hazawa getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hazawa | 1 |
| Berger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Hong Kong(08-27-25)
S. Hazawa vs A. Berger H2H Profile
S. Hazawa vs A. Berger Match Preview:
- Hazawa's second serve success rate stands at 45.07%, outperforming Berger's 39.29% over the last six months. How might this strength influence the match result? Strong second serves often correlate with match wins.
- When receiving, Hazawa excels against first serves, winning 29.49% of points compared to Berger’s 21.73%. In contrast, Berger has the edge over second serves, securing 44.92% versus Hazawa's 41.41%.
- Both players fall short of each other in different returning aspects, revealing diverse defensive capabilities that could sway the match’s rhythm.
- Under pressure, Hazawa saves 54.95% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Berger's 51.15%. Does this suggest Hazawa has a mental edge when it comes to crucial points?
- Over the past year, Berger has won 53.85% of his matches, besting Hazawa’s 43.59% win rate. Could Berger's winning momentum be a deciding factor?
- Both find Hard courts their best surface, sharing a 58% win rate. However, Hazawa struggles more on Indoor Hard, while Berger finds Clay to be his weak spot.
- Within their current tournament circuit, Berger shows stronger performance, winning 53.85% of $10K events compared to Hazawa’s 41.94% win rate.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Berger faces slightly better-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 356.05 versus Hazawa’s 382.13.
- In deciding sets, Berger excels, winning 60% of such matches, markedly higher than Hazawa’s 25% success rate. Could this resilience be Berger's match clincher?
- When breaking serves, Berger again leads, converting 33.93% of breakpoints, compared to Hazawa's 27.85% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (August 27, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Hazawa and Berger presents multiple layers of competitive analysis. While Hazawa demonstrates superior capability on second serves and excels in first serve returns, Berger's edge in breaking points and set-deciding resilience creates a compelling narrative.
A noteworthy point of comparison arises from their proportionate tournament success, as Berger continues to maintain stronger form in matches across the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K sphere.
With a better breakpoint conversion rate and greater success in high-pressure situations, Berger is poised to have a slight advantage over Hazawa.
Considering these elements combined with their performance on similar surfaces, it seems Berger is the more likely candidate to emerge victorious in this match.
Shinji Hazawa vs Antoine Berger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Hazawa vs A. Berger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:20:8 | Average Match Time | 2:20:8 |
| 70% (48/69) | 1st Serve % | 55% (45/82) |
| 75% (36/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 82% (37/45) |
| 67% (14/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (14/37) |
| 17% (2/12) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 38% (31/82) | Return Points Win % | 28% (19/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Hazawa Recent Matches Played
A. Berger Recent Matches Played

S. Hazawa vs A. Berger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.00% (140/110) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (68/68) |
| 54.91% (313/257) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.20% (149/142) |
| 52.25% (2800/2559) | Games Win/Loss | 51.69% (1423/1330) |
| 57.99% (127/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.47% (48/37) |
| 45.45% (5/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 40.00% (8/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (16/24) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 806 | Aces Total | 354 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 411 | Total Double Faults | 447 |
| 1:27:25 | Average Match Time | 1:3:51 |
| 447.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 287 |
| 65% (8941/13702) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3223/5475) |
| 68% (6076/8941) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (2316/3223) |
| 50% (2365/4761) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (987/2252) |
| 40% (544/1359) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (208/495) |
| 39% (5544/14042) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2089/5506) |
| 41.67% (20/28) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.41% (120/82) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (68/68) |
| 55% (133/243) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (65/132) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (33/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (10/21) |
| 46% (34/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (7/24) |
| 82% (142/116) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (72/61) |
| 18% (142/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (72/11) |
| 21% (107/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (63/6) |